Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn., 283 U.S. 522 (1931)

U.S. Supreme Court, (May 18, 1931)

Docket number: 445

/us/283/522/case.html
Permanent Link: http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/20016756
Id. vLex: VLEX-20016756

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - Edwin Sawyer, Alice Frame, Lorene Hildebran and Doris Larsen, Appellants, v. Stanley L. Davis, Executor of the Estate of Doil S. Hunter, Deceased, Appellee., 408 F.2d 358 (8th Cir. 1969)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - Sprague & Rhodes Commodity Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Instituto Mexicano Del Cafe, Respondent-Appellee., 566 F.2d 861 (2nd Cir. 1977)

U.S. Supreme Court - Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574 (1999)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Harrah'S Club, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toshi Van Blitter, Defendant-Appellant., 902 F.2d 774 (9th Cir. 1990)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - Alex E. Winslow, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry N. Walters, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, Defendant-Appellee., 815 F.2d 1114 (7th Cir. 1987)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - Gregory C. Blumberg, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard C. Berland and Baird, Patrick & Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellees., 678 F.2d 1068 (11th Cir. 1982)

Georgia Court Of Appeals - Hoesch America, Inc. v. Dai Yang Metal Company, Ltd., 217 Ga. App. 845, 459 S.E.2d 187 (1995)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust Fund, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony G. Angelos, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 839 F.2d 366 (7th Cir. 1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Louisville Bedding Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pillowtex Corporation, Defendant., 455 F.3d 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2006)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court BALDWIN v. IOWA STATE TRAVELING MEN'S ASS'N, 283 U.S. 522 (1931)

[Page 283 U.S. 522, 527]

of service did not amount to a general appearance. Subsequent proceedings in the state court, therefore, were taken without the presence of the bank, and were not binding upon it unless the res to be affected was in Florida and subject to the control of the state court. That point was not litigated by the bank-it was not present. This Court held there was not such res subject to the power of the state court, and therefore its judgment was not binding upon those who were not actual parties.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Reversed. Footnotes

Footnote 1 282 U.S. 827, 51 S. Ct. 81, 75 L. Ed. -.

Footnote 2 40 F.(2d) 357.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access