U.S. Supreme Court, (May 16, 1932)
Docket number: 122, 485, 486
/us/286/210/case.html
Permanent Link:
http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/20016980
Id. vLex: VLEX-20016980
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Supreme Court - Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n, 372 U.S. 84 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court - Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U.S. 825 (1973)
U.S. Supreme Court - Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co., 340 U.S. 179 (1950)
U.S. Supreme Court - Tilton v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 672 (1971)
U.S. Supreme Court - Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Brock, 480 U.S. 678 (1987)
U.S. Supreme Court - Hooper v. Bernalillo County Assessor, 472 U.S. 612 (1985)
U.S. Supreme Court - Zobel v. Williams, 457 U.S. 55 (1982)
U.S. Supreme Court CHAMPLIN REFINING CO. v. CORPORATION COM'N, 286 U.S. 210 (1932)
[Page 286 U.S. 210, 243] oil industry sufficiently definite to enable those familiar with the operation of oil wells to apply them with any reasonable degree of certainty. The meaning of the word 'waste' necessarily depends upon many factors subject to frequent changes. No act or definite course of conduct is specified as controlling, and, upon the trial of one charged with committing waste in violation of the act, the court could not foresee or prescribe the scope of the inquiry that reasonably might have a bearing or be necessary in determining whether in fact there had been waste. It is no more definite than would be a mere command that wells shall not be operated in any way that is detrimental to the public interest in respect of the production of crude oil. And the ascertainment of the facts necessary for the application of the rule of proportionate production laid down in section 4 would require regular gauging of all producing wells in each field; a work far beyond anything that reasonably may be required of a producer in order to determine whether in the operation of his wells as is committing an offense against the act. In the light of our decisions, it appears upon a mere inspection that these general words and phrases are so vague and indefinite that any penalty prescribed for their violation constitutes a denial of due process of law. It is not the penalty itself that is invalid, but the exaction of obedience to a rule or standard that is so vague and indefinite as to be really no rule or standard at all. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery, 255 U.S. 81, 89, 41 S. Ct. 298, 14 A. L. R. 1045; Small Co. v. Am. Sugar Ref. Co., 267 U.S. 233, 239, 45 S. Ct. 295; Connally v. General Construction Co., supra; Cline v. Frink Dairy Co., 274 U.S. 445, 454, 47 S. Ct. 681; Smith v. Cahoon, 283 U.S. 553, 564, 51 S. Ct. 582. No. 122, dismissed; No. 485, affirmed; No. 486, modified, and, as modified, affirmed. Footnotes Footnote 1 C. O. S. 1921, 7954-7963. 1. That the production of crude oil or petroleum in the State of Oklahoma, in such manner and under such conditions as to constitute waste, is hereby prohibited. ( 7954.) 2. That the taking of crude oil or petroleum from any oil-bearing sand or sands in the State of Oklahoma at a time when there is not a market demand therefor at the well at a price equivalent to the actual value of such crude oil or petroleum is hereby prohibited, and the actual value of such crude oil or petroleum at any time shall be the average value as near as may be ascertained in the United States at retail of the byproducts of such crude oil or petroleum when refined less the cost and a reasonable profit in the business of transporting, refining and marketing the same, and the Corporation Commission of this State is hereby invested ( sic) with the authority and power to investigate and determine from time to time the actual value of such crude oil or petroleum by the standard herein provided, and when so determined said Commission shall promulgate its findings by its orders duly made and recorded, and publish the same in some newspaper of general circulation in the State. ( 7955.) 3. That the term 'waste' as used herein, in addition to its ordinary meaning, shall include economic waste, underground waste, surface waste, and waste incident to the production of crude oil or petroleum in excess of transportation or marketing facilities or reasonable market demands. The Corporation Commission shall have authority to make rules and regulations for the prevention of such wastes, and for the protection of all fresh water strata, and oil and gas bearing strata, encountered in any well drilled for oil. ( 7956.) 4. That whenever the full production from any common source of supply of crude oil or petroleum in this State can only be obtained under conditions constituting waste as herein defined, then any per- son, firm or corporation, having the right to drill into and produce oil from any such common source of supply, may take therefrom only such proportion of all crude oil and petroleum that may be produced therefrom, without waste, as the production of the well or wells of any such person, firm or corporation, bears to the total production of such common source of supply. The Corporation Commission is authorized to so regulate the taking of crude oil or petroleum from any or all such common sources of supply, within the State of Oklahoma, as to prevent the inequitable or unfair taking, from a common source of supply, of such crude oil or petroleum, by any person, firm, or corporation, and to prevent unreasonable discrimination in favor of any one such common source of supply as against another. ( 7957.) 5. That for the purpose of determining such production, a gauge of each well shall be taken under rules and regulations to be prescribed by the Corporation Commission, and said Commission is authorized and directed to make and promulgate, by proper order, such other rules and regulations, and to employ or appoint such agents with the consent of the Governor, as may be necessary to enforce this act. ( 7958). 6. That any person, firm, or corporation, or the Attorney General on behalf of the State, may institute proceedings before the Corporation Commission, or apply for a hearing before said Commission, upon any question relating to the enforcement of this act, and jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon said Commission to hear and determine the same. Said Commission shall set a time and place, when and where such hearing shall be had and give reasonable notice thereof to all persons or classes interested therein, by publication in some newspaper or newspapers, having general circulation in the State, and in addition thereto, shall cause reasonable notice in writing to be served personally on any person, firm or corporation complained against. In the exercise and enforcement of such jurisdiction, said Commission is authorized to determine any question or fact, arising hereunder, and to summon witnesses, make ancillary orders, and use mesne and final process, including inspection and punishment as for contempt, analogous to proceedings under its control over public service corporations, as now provided by law. ( 7959.) 7. That appellate jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the Supreme Court in this State to review the action of said Commission in making any order, or orders, under this act. Such appeal may be taken by any person, firm or corporation, shown by the record to be interested therein, in the same manner and time as appeals are allowed by law from other orders of the Corporation Commission. Said orders so appealed from shall not be superseded by the mere fact of such appeal being taken, but shall be and remain in full force and effect until legally suspended or set aside by the Supreme Court. ( 7960.) 8. That in addition to any penalty that may be imposed by the Corporation Commission for contempt, any person, firm, or corporation, or any officer, agent or employee thereof, directly or indirectly violating the provisions of this act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, in a court of competent jurisdiction, shall be punished by a fine in any sum not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000. 00), or by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed thirty (30) days, or by both fine and imprisonment. ( 7961.) 9. That in addition to any penalty imposed under the preceding section, any person, firm or corporation, violating the provisions of producing property be subject to have his or its producing property placed in the hands of a receiver by a court of competent jurisdiction, at the suit of the State through the Attorney General, or any county attorney, but such receivership shall only extend to the operating of producing wells and the marketing of the production thereof, under the provisions of this act. ( 7962.) 10. That the invalidity of any section, sub-division, clause or sentence of this act shall not in any manner effect (sic) the validity of the remaining portion thereof. ( 7963.)Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access