Semler v. Oregon Bd. of Dental Examiners, 294 U.S. 608 (1935)
U.S. Supreme Court, (April 01, 1935)
Docket number: 538
/us/294/608/case.html
Permanent Link:
http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/20017715
Id. vLex: VLEX-20017715
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
Document language
Search in this document
Document options
RSSU.S. Supreme Court - Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court - Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975)
U.S. Supreme Court - Bates v. State Bar of Ariz., 433 U.S. 350 (1977)
U.S. Supreme Court - Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn., 436 U.S. 447 (1978)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - Public Citizen, Health Research Group and Maryland Public Interest Research Group, Appellants, v. Commission on Medical Discipline of Maryland, Elmer G. Einhardt, Charles Bagley, Jerome Coller, Eli Lippman, Carl F. Meck, Members, Commission on Medical Discipline of Maryland, Medical and Chirurgical Faculty of the State of Maryland, William Carl Ebeling, President, Medical and Chirurgical Faculty of the State of Maryland, Prince George'S County Medical Society, and John T. Lynn, President, Prince George'S County Medical Society, John M. Dennis, John E. Adams, and William G. Speed, Iii, Appellees., 573 F.2d 863 (4th Cir. 1978) Health Research Group and Maryland Public Interest Research Group, Appellants, v. Commission on Medical Discipline of Maryland, Elmer G. Einhardt, Charles Bagley, Jerome Coller, Eli Lippman, Carl F. Meck, Members, Commission on Medical Discipline of Maryland, Medical and Chirurgical Faculty of the State of Maryland, William Carl Ebeling, President, Medical and Chirurgical Faculty of the State of Maryland, Prince George'S County Medical Society, and John T. Lynn, President, Prince George'S County Medical Society, John M. Dennis, John E. Adams, and William G. Speed, Iii, Appellees.
U.S. Supreme Court - Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456 (1981)
U.S. Supreme Court - Bigelow v. Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975)
U.S. Supreme Court SEMLER v. OREGON STATE BD. OF DENTAL EXAMINERS, 294 U.S. 608 (1935)
[Page 294 U.S. 608, 613] The legislature was entitled to consider the general effects of the practices which it described, and if these effects were injurious in facilitating unwarranted and misleading claims, to counteract them by a general rule even though in particular instances there might be no actual deception or misstatement. Booth v. Illinois, 184 U.S. 425, 429, 22 S.Ct. 425; Purity Extract & Tonic Company v. Lynch, 226 U.S. 192, 201, 33 S.Ct. 44; Hebe Company .v Shaw, 248 U.S. 297, 303, 39 S.Ct. 125; Pierce Oil Corporation v. Hope, , 500; Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Company, 272 U.S. 365, 388, 389 S., 47 S.Ct. 114, 54 A.L.R. 1016 The judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
- Constitutions
- Forms and Contracts
- Legal Books and Journals
- Case Law
- News and Business
- Regulations
- U.S. Code
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access
