United States v. Atkinson, 297 U.S. 157 (1936)

U.S. Supreme Court, (January 08, 1936)

Docket number: 265

/us/297/157/case.html
Permanent Link: http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/20017985
Id. vLex: VLEX-20017985

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ferdinand Richard Balcar, Jr., Defendant-Appellant., 141 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Connie S. Adams, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brown & Root, Inc., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 81-3558. Summary Calendar., 688 F.2d 410 (5th Cir. 1982)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - US v. Carter (4th Cir. 2003)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - US v. German (4th Cir. 1997)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - US v. Campbell (4th Cir. 1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge Domingo Bendek, Anthony William Carreras, Defendants-Appellants., 146 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - USA vs. Montalvo-Torres (5th Cir. 2000)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6573, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,213 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dagoberto Rodriguez-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant., 63 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 1995)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - US v. Mickens (4th Cir. 2004)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court U.S. v. ATKINSON, 297 U.S. 157 (1936)

[Page 297 U.S. 157, 160]

In exceptional circumstances, especially in criminal cases, appellate courts, in the public interest, may, of their own motion, notice errors to which no exception has been taken, if the errors are obvious, or if they otherwise seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. See New York Central R. Co. v. Johnson, 279 U.S. 310, 318, 49 S.Ct. 300; Brasfield v. United States, 272 U.S. 448, 450, 47 S.Ct. 135. But no such case is presented here. The judgment must be affirmed for the reason that the error assigned was not made the subject of appropriate exception or request to charge upon the trial.

Affirmed. Footnotes

Footnote 1 ' 512. Not later than July 2, 1926, all term insurance held by persons who were in the military service after April 6, 1917, shall be converted, without medical examination, into such form or forms of insurance as may be prescribed by regulations and as the insured may request. Regulations shall provide for the right to convert into ordinary life, twenty-payment life, endowment maturing at age sixty-two, and into other usual forms of insurance. ... Provisions for maturity at certain ages, for continuous installments during the life of the insured or beneficiaries, or both, for cash, loan, paidup and extended values, dividends from gains and savings, and such other provisions for the protection and advantage of and for alternative benefits to the insured and the beneficiaries as may be found to be reasonable and practicable, may be provided for in the contract of insurance, or from time to time by regulations.'

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access