U.S. Supreme Court, (February 10, 1936)
Docket number: 303
/us/297/233/case.html
Permanent Link:
http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/20018017
Id. vLex: VLEX-20018017
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Supreme Court - Austin v. New Hampshire, 420 U.S. 656 (1975)
U.S. Supreme Court - Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241 (1974)
U.S. Supreme Court - Leathers v. Medlock, 499 U.S. 439 (1991)
U.S. Supreme Court - McDaniel v. Paty, 435 U.S. 618 (1978)
U.S. Supreme Court - Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., 525 U.S. 182 (1999)
U.S. Supreme Court - Nichols v. United States, 511 U.S. 738 (1994)
U.S. Supreme Court - Houchins v. KQED, Inc., 438 U.S. 1 (1978)
U.S. Supreme Court GROSJEAN v. AMERICAN PRESS CO., 297 U.S. 233 (1936)
[Page 297 U.S. 233, 251] national existence has undertaken to impose a tax like that now in question. The form in which the tax is imposed is in itself suspicious. It is not measured or limited by the volume of advertisements. It is measured alone by the extent of the circulation of the publication in which the advertisements are carried, with the plain purpose of penalizing the publishers and curtailing the circulation of a selected group of newspapers. 2. Having reached the conclusion that the act imposing the tax in question is unconstitutional under the due process of law clause because it abridges the freedom of the press, we deem it unnecessary to consider the further ground assigned, that it also constitutes a denial of the equal protection of the laws. Decree affirmed.Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access