Lowden v. Northwestern Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 298 U.S. 160 (1936)

U.S. Supreme Court, (April 27, 1936)

Docket number: 743

/us/298/160/case.html
Permanent Link: http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/20018161
Id. vLex: VLEX-20018161

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - George P. Baker Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc., Defendant-Appellee., 484 F.2d 950 (7th Cir. 1973)

U.S. Supreme Court - CAB v. American Air Transport, Inc., 344 U.S. 4 (1952)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Sam Kagel and John Kagel, as Trustee of the Estate of San Francisco & Oakland Helicopter Airlines, Inc., Debtor Corporation in Proceedings Under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, Appellees, v. First Commonwealth Company, Inc., a Corporation, Et Al., Appellants., 534 F.2d 194 (9th Cir. 1976)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - in the Matter of the Lehigh and Hudson River Railway Company, Debtor. George P. Baker Et Al., Appellants, v. John G. Troiano, Trustee of the Property of the Lehigh and Hudson River Railway Company, Debtor, Appellee., 468 F.2d 430 (2nd Cir. 1972)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit - in the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. Appeal of Cji Industries, Inc., Formerly Known as Central Jersey Industries, Inc., 838 F.2d 686 (3rd Cir. 1988)

U.S. Supreme Court - Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc., 417 U.S. 467 (1974)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit - James L. Buckley Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Hon. Francis R. Valeo Et Al., Defendants, Center for Public Financing of Elections, Common Cause, the League of Women Voters of the United States, Chellis O'Neal Gregory, Norman P. Jacknis, Susan B. King, Daniel R. Noyes, Mrs. Edgar B. Stern, Charles P. Taft, John W. Gardner, and Ruth Clusen, Intervening Defendants., 519 F.2d 817 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit - in Re Crouthamel Potato Chip Company, (Debtor). Appeal of Local 1092, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, Appellant., 786 F.2d 141 (3rd Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - Diversa-Graphics, Inc., Appellee, v. Management & Technical Services Company, Appellant., 561 F.2d 725 (8th Cir. 1977)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court LOWDEN v. NORTHWESTERN NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. OF MINNEAPOLIS, 298 U.S. 160 (1936)

[Page 298 U.S. 160, 166]

interested factions and shaping his decree accordingly. We have no thought at this time to foreshadow the result of an exploring expedition directed to those ends. When all the facts are known, they may be found to offer no excuse for a departure from the rule in bankruptcy which, as indicated already, is generally, even if not always, the rule in equity as well. They may point, on the other hand, to the need for an exception, or may even lead to a decree in the nature of a compromise, the moneys being paid into the registry of the court to abide its f ture action. A decision balancing the equities must await the exposure of a concrete situation with all its qualifying incidents. What we disclaim at the moment is a willingness to put the law into a strait-jacket by subjecting it to a pronouncement of needless generality.

Question No. 3 is so framed as not to call for an answer unless an affirmative answer is given to questions Nos. 1 and 2.

Our conclusion as to the defective form of the certificate is borne out in a striking way by the concession of the parties. Before the argument on the questions, plaintiffs and defendant joined in moving us for an order to bring up the whole case. That motion was denied. Nothing in the nature of the controversy called for a writ of certiorari in advance of a decision by the court of intermediate appeal. The significant thing, however, is that in briefs submitted on that motion both parties admitted that the second question was defective. The plaintiffs said: The statement 'is not sufficiently complete to enable this court to answer the second question as applied to this case.' The defendant made a like objection. Plaintiffs and defendant fortified their general criticism by the enumeration of particular defects.

The certificate is dismissed. Footnotes

[Footnote *] The references in this opinion are to section 77 as enacted March 3, 1933, 47 Stat. 1474, and not to the amendments of August 27, 1935, 49 Stat. 911, 926.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access