Scher v. United States, 305 U.S. 251 (1938)

U.S. Supreme Court, (November 09, 1938)

Docket number: 49

/us/305/251/case.html
Permanent Link: http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/20019003
Id. vLex: VLEX-20019003

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Supreme Court - Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583 (1974)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Appellant, v. Continental Finance & Loan Co. of West End, Et Al., Appellees., 326 F.2d 561 (5th Cir. 1964)

U.S. Supreme Court - Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Jimenez, Defendant-Appellant., 789 F.2d 167 (2nd Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Defendant-Appellee, v. Lonell Roberts, Plaintiff-Appellant., 434 F.2d 1016 (5th Cir. 1970)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - USA vs. Alvarez (5th Cir. 2003)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Thomas Clark, Aka Mule, Defendant-Appellant. No. 73-1120. Summary Calendar. [Fn*], 482 F.2d 103 (5th Cir. 1973)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberta Lloyd, Defendant-Appellant., 400 F.2d 414 (6th Cir. 1968)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - United States of America, Appellant, v. Steven Dale Newbourn, Appellee. United States of America, Appellant, v. Larry Steven Jeffery, Appellee., 600 F.2d 452 (4th Cir. 1979)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court SCHER v. UNITED STATES, 305 U.S. 251 (1938)

[Page 305 U.S. 251, 255]

and the application of this to the facts there disclosed, it seems plain enough that just before he entered the garage the following officers properly could have stopped petitioner's car, made search and put him under arrest. So much was not seriously controverted at the argument.

Passage of the car into the open garage closely followed by the observing officer did not destroy this right. No search was made of the garage. Examination of the automobile accompanied an arrest, without objection and upon admission of probable guilt. The officers did nothing either unreasonable or oppressive. Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, 30, 46 S.Ct. 4, 5, 51 A.L.R. 409; Wisniewski v. United States, 6 Cir., 47 F.2d 825, 826.

The challenged judgment is affirmed. Footnotes

Footnote 1 Ch. 1, secs. 201, 207, 48 Stat. 313, 316, 317 (U.S.C., Title 26, 1152a, 1152g, 26 U.S.C.A. 1152a, 1152g)-'No person shall ... transport, possess, buy, sell, or transfer any distilled spirits, unless the immediate container thereof has affixed thereto a stamp denoting the quantity of distilled spirits contained therein and evidencing payment of all internal-revenue taxes imposed on such spirits. The provsions of this title (this section and sections 1152b to 1152g) shall not apply to-'(f) Distilled spirits not intended for sale or for use in the manufacture or production of any article intended for sale; ....'

Sec. 207-'Any person who violates any provision of this title ( sections 1152a to 1152g), ... shall on conviction be punished by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by imprisonment at hard labor not exceeding five years, or by both.'

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access