U.S. Supreme Court, (January 28, 1939)
Docket number: 605
/us/306/204/case.html
Permanent Link:
http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/20019101
Id. vLex: VLEX-20019101
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Supreme Court - Gunn v. University Comm. to End War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383 (1970)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Dorothy Schwartz Rojas, Schwartz Farms, Inc., and Estate of Charles R. Schwartz, Deceased, Bank of America, National Trust and Savings Association, Administrator, Petitioners-Appellees, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellant. Dorothy Schwartz Rojas, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee. Schwartz Farms, Inc., Estate of Charles R. Schwartz, Deceased, Et Al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee., 901 F.2d 810 (9th Cir. 1990) Schwartz Farms, Inc., and Estate of Charles R. Schwartz, Deceased, Bank of America, National Trust and Savings Association, Administrator, Petitioners-Appellees, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellant. Dorothy Schwartz Rojas, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee. Schwartz Farms, Inc., Estate of Charles R. Schwartz, Deceased, Et Al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee.
U.S. Supreme Court PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI v. BRASHEAR FREIGHT LINES, 306 U.S. 204 (1939)
[Page 306 U.S. 204, 207] 151, 176, 54 S.Ct. 658, 668. And as no appeal has been taken to review the decree denying the injunction, this Court is without jurisdiction. Section 266 as originally enacted applied only to cases in which an interlocutory injunction was granted or denied and the purpose was to make interference by such an injunction with the enforcement of state legislation a matter for the adequate hearing and full deliberation which the presence of three judges was likely to secure. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission, 260 U.S. 212, 216, 43 S.Ct. 75, 76; Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 282 U.S. 10, 14, 51 S.Ct. 8, 9. The amendment that the requirement of a court of three judges should also apply to the final hearing on the application for a permanent injunction was to end the anomalous situation in which a single judge might reconsider and decide questions already passed upon by three judges on the application for an interlocutory injunction. Smith v. Wilson, 273 U.S. 388, 390, 391 S., 47 S.Ct. 385, 386; Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., supra. And, as direct appeal to this Court was permitted from an order granting or denying an interlocutory injunction, the amendment provided also for such a direct appeal from a final decree granting or denying a permanent injunction. It necessarily follows that, unless there is a proper appeal from a decree granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction, the provision in Section 266 for a direct appeal to this Court has no application. The appeal is dismissed. It is so ordered. Appeal dismissed.Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access