Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Knox, 277 U.S. 218 (1928)

U.S. Supreme Court, (May 14, 1928)

Docket number: 288

/us/277/218/case.html
Permanent Link: http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/20026088
Id. vLex: VLEX-20026088

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Sponsored Ads:

RSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Supreme Court - Gurley v. Rhoden, 421 U.S. 200 (1975)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - Barbara Brown, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Mark Brown; Herman Brown, Father and Parent of Robert Mark Brown; Sharon Schaub, Judy Grove, W. Herman Brown, Paula Brown, Brothers and Sisters of Robert Mark Brown, Appellants, v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, Appellee., 703 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir. 1983)

U.S. Supreme Court - United States v. County of Fresno, 429 U.S. 452 (1977)

U.S. Supreme Court - Massachusetts v. United States, 435 U.S. 444 (1978)

U.S. Supreme Court - United States v. New Mexico, 455 U.S. 720 (1982)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit - United States of America Appellant, v. State of New Jersey; Violent Crimes Compensation Board, Appellees., 831 F.2d 458 (3rd Cir. 1987)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Federal Express Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. California Public Utilities Commission; Stanley W. Hulett; Donald Vial; Frederick R. Duda; John B. Ohanian; G. Michael Wilk; Victor Weiser; Norman Kelley, Defendants-Appellees., 936 F.2d 1075 (9th Cir. 1991)

U.S. Supreme Court - Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (1983)

U.S. Supreme Court - South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988)

See all citations to this document

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court PANHANDLE OIL CO. v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EX REL. KNOX, 277 U.S. 218 (1928)

[Page 277 U.S. 218, 226]

from which it is taken, and to that extent diminishes the subject upon which federal taxes may be laid. The States are, and they must ever be, coexistent with the national government. Neither may destroy the other. Hence the federal Constitution must receive a practical construction. Its limitations and its implied prohibitions must not be extended so far as to destroy the necessary powers of the States, or prevent their efficient exercise.'

Mr. Justice STONE concurs in these views.

Sponsored Ads:

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

Constitutions
Forms and Contracts
Legal Books and Journals
Case Law
News and Business
Regulations
U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access

Home / United States /

Case Law

vlex /