Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Standard Oil Co. of Tex., 391 U.S. 366 <I>(per curiam)</I> (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court, (May 20, 1968)

Docket number: 503

/us/391/366/case.html
Permanent Link: http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/brooklyn-union-gas-standard-oil-tex-19991170
Id. vLex: VLEX-19991170

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Gte California, Inc., Petitioner, Pacific Bell; Nevada Bell; National Cable Television Association, Inc. ('Ncta'); Pacific Telesis Group, Intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America, Respondents, California Cable Television Association; National Cable Television Association, Inc., Respondents-Intervenors., 39 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 1994) Inc., Petitioner, Pacific Bell; Nevada Bell; National Cable Television Association, Inc. ('Ncta'); Pacific Telesis Group, Intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America, Respondents, California Cable Television Association; National Cable Television Association, Inc., Respondents-Intervenors.

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO. v. STANDARD OIL CO., 391 U.S. 366 (1968) 391 U.S. 366

BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO. ET AL. v. STANDARD OIL CO. OF TEXAS ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 503. Decided May 20, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 376 F.2d 578, reversed.

Edwin F. Russell and Barbara M. Suchow for Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Bertram D. Moll and Morton L. Simons for Long Island Lighting Co., and Kent H. Brown for Public Service Commission of the State of New York, petitioners.

Martin N. Erck and Frank S. Troidl for respondent Humble Oil & Refining Co.; Thomas G. Crouch, Robert W. Henderson, and Donald K. Young for respondent Hunt; Sherman S. Poland for respondent Coates; Robert V. Smith for respondent Patchin-Wilmoth Industries, Inc.; J. Evans Attwell and W. H. Drushel, Jr., for respondent Clark Fuel Producing Co.; William K. Tell, Jr., William R. Slye, and James D. Annett for respondent Texaco Inc.; Phillip D. Endom, Robert E. May, and Francis H. Caskin for respondent Sun Oil Co.; Homer E. McEwen, Jr., for respondent Sunray DX Oil Co.; Richard F. Remmers for respondent Sohio Petroleum Co.; and Kiel Boone for respondent Cox.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co., ante, p. 9.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[Page 391 U.S. 366, 367]

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access