Fox v. Capital Co., 299 U.S. 105 (1936)

U.S. Supreme Court, (October 16, 1936)

Docket number: 23

/us/299/105/case.html
Permanent Link: http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/fox-v-capital-20018300
Id. vLex: VLEX-20018300

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Notice: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Harry Brummer, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Asheville, John M. Acee, Chairman of the Board of Adjustment, and Individually, Raymond Myers, Individually and Wife, Raymond Myers, Mrs., H.M. Heywood, Individually and Wife, Pauline G. Heywood, Defendants-Appellees., 911 F.2d 720 (4th Cir. 1990)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. - James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul J. Mahoney, D/B/a Mahoney'S Rocky Ledge Farm and Nursery, Defendant-Appellant., 460 F.2d 326 (1st Cir. 1972)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Lloyd I. Hughes, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. William Sharp, Defendant-Appellant., 476 F.2d 975 (9th Cir. 1973)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Island Creek Coal Company, Rebel Coal Company, Cole and White Coal Company, Paul J. Rayburn Construction Company, Elm Coal Corporation and Western Coal Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Local Union No. 1827 of the United Mine Workers of America, Defendant-Appellant., 568 F.2d 7 (6th Cir. 1977)

U.S. Supreme Court - New York Times Co. v. Jascalevich, 439 U.S. 1317 (1978)

U.S. Supreme Court - New York Times Co. v. Jascalevich, 439 U.S. 1317 (1978)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-Appellee, William T. Dolan, Receiver, Appellee, v. Neil T. Naftalin, Defendant-Appellant., 460 F.2d 471 (8th Cir. 1972)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Briggs v. City of Norfolk (4th Cir. 2003)

U.S. Supreme Court - Hicks v. Feiock, 485 U.S. 624 (1988)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court FOX v. CAPITAL CO., 299 U.S. 105 (1936)

[Page 299 U.S. 105, 109]

endeavor to reimburse a harassed creditor for the damages occasioned by obstruction and delay. Errors, if there were any, did not split the controversy into parts, one civil and one criminal. Cf. Collins v. Miller, 252 U.S. 364, 370, 40 S.Ct. 347, 349. It retained from first to last its unitary quality. In levying the fine, the court was not acting sua sponte, or at the instance of the government through a prosecuting officer. Gompers v. Buck's Stove & Range Co., supra; Lamb v. Cramer, supra; Union Tool Co. v. Wilson, 259 U.S. 107, 112, 42 S.Ct. 427, 429; Michaelson v. United States, 266 U.S. 42, 64, 45 S.Ct. 18, 19, 35 A.L.R. 451; Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co., 284 U.S. 448, 452, 52 S.Ct. 238, 240. It lent a helping hand to a suppliant for aid.

The order is not final and there is no error in the ruling that it is not subject to appeal.

AFFIRMED.

Mr. Justice STONE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access