Garfinkle v. Garfinkle, 363 U.S. 143 (per curiam) (1960)
Linked as:
Text
U.S. Supreme Court SENIOR v. ZONING COMMISSION OF NEW CANAAN,
SENIOR v. ZONING COMMISSION OF NEW CANAAN. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT. No. 620. Decided May 31, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 146 Conn. 531, 153 A. 2d 415.
Raymond T. Benedict, Morgan P. Ames, Francis J. McNamara, Jr. and John F. Spindler for appellant.
Ira E. Hicks, Norwick R. G. Goodspeed, John C. Sturges and Samuel A. Gilliland for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE,
GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 799, Misc. Decided May 31, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 29 N. J. 506, 150 A. 2d 291.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
[Page 363 U.S. 143, 144]
Sponsored links
