Lucas v. Alexander, 279 U.S. 573 (1929)

U.S. Supreme Court, (May 20, 1929)

Docket number: 481

/us/279/573/case.html
Permanent Link: http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/lucas-v-alexander-20026340
Id. vLex: VLEX-20026340

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Scott Bradley, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Charles M. Mann, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. George A. Rose, Appellant., 418 F.2d 688 (4th Cir. 1969)

U.S. Supreme Court - National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler, 510 U.S. 249 (1994)

U.S. Supreme Court - Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Constr. Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568 (1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - George E. Farrell, as Administrator de Bonis Non of the Estate of Wyand F. Doerner, Jr., Deceased, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., the Boeing Company and United States of America, Defendants, and Rapidair, Inc., and Lanseair, Inc., Defendants-Appellees., 411 F.2d 812 (2nd Cir. 1969)

U.S. Supreme Court - INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Denneth Bass, Defendant-Appellant., 434 F.2d 1296 (2nd Cir. 1970)

U.S. Supreme Court - Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83 (1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Cordelia Kelsey, Infant, By Her Parent, Louise Kelsey, Et Al., Appellants, v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Individually and as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Et Al., 498 F.2d 701 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Joseph C. Frady, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee. Richard A. Gordon, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee., 348 F.2d 84 (D.C. Cir. 1965)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court LUCAS v. ALEXANDER, 279 U.S. 573 (1929)

[Page 279 U.S. 573, 581]

each policy, for the former $50,000 and for the latter $10,398.50, which, taken together, made up the total payment received by the taxpayer on each policy. They constitute a complete record and determination of the actual economic gain annually accruing upon the policies which was ultimately realized by the taxpayer, and they provide an adequate basis for ascertaining the proportion of the total value realized which had accrued on March 1, 1913. The sum of the insurance reserve liability and the dividend accumulations provisionally apportioned to the two policies on March 1, 1913, their accrued value on that date, was $94,800. As that valuation is larger than that found by either of the lower courts and is supported by reliable data, we may, in the absence of other evidence, accept it as sufficiently establishing that the value found below was not more than that required to be ascertained by the statute, and so did not prejudice the rights of petitioner. It is unnecessary to consider the question mooted whether upon other evidence, not here presented, a larger value as of March 1, 1913, might have been found.

The court below, by discounting the total estimated value of the policies at their maturity at 4 per cent., arrived at a rough approximation of their accrued value on that date. This method, however, did not ascertain that value or the taxable gain with accuracy, since it was based on an assumed instead of the actual value of the policies at maturity. It discounted the assumed value at a flat rate of interest instead of at that actually earned, and it left out of account savings from estimated expenses and death losses which, as well as actual interest earned, were taken into account in determining dividend accumulations annually ascertained and credited to the policies on the books of the company. But, as the accuracy of the computation is not questioned here, and as it gave a result of which petitioner cannot complaint, the judgment will be

Affirmed.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access