Scott v. Frazier, 253 U.S. 243 (1920)

U.S. Supreme Court, (June 01, 1920)

Docket number: 508

/us/253/243/case.html
Permanent Link: http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/scott-v-frazier-20019547
Id. vLex: VLEX-20019547

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Cited by:

U.S. Supreme Court - Zahn v. International Paper Co., 414 U.S. 291 (1973)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - Stromberg Metal Works, Inc., and Comfort Control, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Press Mechanical, Inc., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 77 F.3d 928 (7th Cir. 1996)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit - Gertrude P. Fuller, Richard L. Grubman, Thomas F. Cacciola and Josephine Cacciola, His Wife, and Others To Be Named, Plaintiffs-Appellants, in No. 15043 and Jerry Volpe Et Al., Intervening-Plaintiffs-Appellants, in No. 15044 v. Austin A. Volk Et Al., Defendants-Appellees, Frederick M. Raubinger, Commissioner of Education of the State of New Jersey, Kenneth Ancrum, Deborah Spruill, Et Al., Intervening- Defendants-Appellees., 351 F.2d 323 (3rd Cir. 1965)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Alvah L. Snow, on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation, Doe I Through L, Inclusive, Defendants- Appellees., 561 F.2d 787 (9th Cir. 1977)

See all citations to this document

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court SCOTT v. FRAZIER , 253 U.S. 243 (1920)

253 U.S. 243

SCOTT et al. v. FRAZIER et al. No. 508. Argued April 19 and 20, 1920. Decided June 1, 1920.

Messrs. N. C. Young, of Fargo, N. D., and Tracy R. Bangs and C. J. Murphy, both of Grand Forks, N. D., for appellants.

Messrs. S. L. Nuchols, of Mandan, N. D., W. S. Lander, of Wahpeton, N. D., and Frederick A. Pike, of St. Paul, Minn., for appellees.

[Page 253 U.S. 243, 244]

Memorandum opinion by direction of the Court by Mr. Justice DAY.

This suit, so far as the merits are concerned, is like No. 811, just decided. 253 U.S. 233, 40 Sup. Ct. 499, 64 L. Ed. --. It was brought in the District Court of the United States for the District of North Dakota to enjoin the payment of public funds in the state treasury and the issuing of state bonds under the Constitution and laws of North Dakota. We have sufficiently stated the nature of this Constitution and the laws involved in the opinion in No. 811.

The jurisdiction was invoked because of alleged violation of rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The complainants were taxpayers of North Dakota, who alleged that suit was brought on behalf of themselves and all other taxpayers of the state. There was no diversity of citizenship and jurisdiction was rested solely upon the alleged violation of constitutional rights. The District Court rendered a decree dismissing the bill on the merits; the judge stating that he was of opinion that there was no jurisdiction, and directing the dismissal on the merits to prevent delay, and to permit the suit being brought here by a single appeal.

There is no allegation that the loss or injury to any complainant amounts to the sum of $3,000. It is well settled that in such cases as this the amount in controversy must equal the jurisdictional sum as to each complainant. Wheless v. St. Louis, 180 U.S. 379, 21 Sup. Ct. 402; Rogers v. Hennepin County, 239 U.S. 621, 36 Sup. Ct. 217.

The District Court was right in its conclusion that there was no jurisdiction. The decree is reversed, and the cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to dismiss the bill for want of jurisdiction.

So ordered.