Texas v. United States, 384 U.S. 155 <I>(per curiam)</I> (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court, (May 02, 1966)

Docket number: 1218

/us/384/155/case.html

Linked as:



FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

  • Constitution of the United States (Annotated) - Twenty-Fourth Amendment: Abolition of the Poll Tax Qualification in Federal Elections
  • U.S. Supreme Court - Hill v. Stone, 421 U.S. 289 (1975)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Eddie Hull, as Defense Captain of the Black Panther Party and the Black Panther Party, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. August Petrillo, Individually and as Mayor of the City of Mt. Vernon, New York; James Ritz, Individually and as License Clerk of the City of Mt. Vernon, New York; and Thomas Delaney, Individually and as Police Commissioner of the City of Mt. Vernon, New York, Defendants-Appellees., 439 F.2d 1184 (2nd Cir. 1971)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Robert Dean Mattis, M.D., Appellant, v. Patrolman Richard R. Schnarr Et Al., Appellees., 502 F.2d 588 (8th Cir. 1974)

    • Text:

    U.S. Supreme Court TEXAS v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 155 (1966) 384 U.S. 155

    TEXAS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 1218. Decided May 2, 1966.

    252 F. Supp. 234, affirmed.

    Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

    Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663.

    MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, supra.

    MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, joined by MR. JUSTICE STEWART, dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, supra.

    [Page 384 U.S. 155, 156]

    Sponsored links